5 Easy to Memorize Beekeeping Tips

  1. Bee free from fear

  2. …and far from trees.*

  3. Tie back your hair.

  4. No knees, please.

  5. Confidence, fondant patty.

 

1. Bee free from fear. Really, they don’t want to hurt you. The only way toward success is to remain contentedly confident. The more relaxed you are, the more likely things will go well, and vice versa. If you are stressed, the bees can tell, and they’ll react. You’ll also be more likely, if tense/stressed, to have sudden movements or even drop an entire box of bees. The bees would NOT be OK with that.

2. …and far from trees. That doesn’t mean to locate the hives away from all trees*; bees need a certain amount of shade (I can write a post about my thoughts on hive location later). By away from trees, I request that you have a basic escape route in mind when you go into the hives. Don’t back yourself into a corner where, if something goes wrong/nature unleashes upon you, you’ll be stumbling into trees trying to get away. I like to stand next to or behind the hives with my back to the trees while in the field. Also, avoid walking and standing in front of hive entrances. With these tips in mind, add them to a safety plan that empowers and keeps you calm and cool.

3. Tie back your hair. Don’t have anything dangling: clothes, hair, don’t wear extra jewelry. Tie your shoes. You don’t need a bee getting tangled in your hair, or for you to be swatting at a bee thinking it’s part of your outfit. Which brings me to…

4. No knees, please! Bees don’t want to sting you. If there are no special circumstances  (i.e. an animal bothering them earlier) and you’re doing things right, they’re unlikely to sting you unless you hurt them. It is easy for bees to get trapped under your hands, armpits, elbows, or knees between lifting boxes and kneeling and bending, especially if you’re focused on learning your new tasks.

5. Confidence, fondant patty. I’m offering this as a tip because I very much prefer, for my own reasons, to serve these than to deal with frequently replenishing their sugar-water. Mix granulated sugar with just enough water to moisten it into a hamburger patty shape. It should be sticky and thick and stay together nicely. Place that atop the bars and be confondant that they’ll eat the patty. Make sure you provide them (bee-accessible) water outside the hive somewhere, which you should do anyway.

Those are my 5 EZ tips for keeping bees, and I’m sure someone would disagree with me. You can get a dozen different advices and insights on one question from just a few beekeepers, and we like it that way. Comment below, please, if you are a beekeeper!

Questions are welcome! You should explore the curiousity if you have wondered about honeybees.

Tractor Compaction in Orchards

Personal Interest Project: Tractors and Compaction in Orchards

Theresa Werme

6/25/2012

I would like to share my opinion on orchard management and soil compaction. The described methods are not the only way to manage an orchard, but are what I have used with a few new ideas added in.  A commercial orchard operation requires year-round management and care in order to produce apples.  If you have an orchard, and one tree has a problem, that problem can spread easily.  Many commercial apple-growers spray something and use need heavy machinery to do so.  In a sample spray schedule for an organic orchard, the UMASS Extension suggests spraying nutrients, insecticides and fungicides adding up to about 35 trips down each row.  In a compact tractor, doing that every year, just for spraying, could potentially create heavy compaction. There are multiple types of sprayers. An orchardist can walk around with or drive around on a tractor using a handgun sprayer, or, more likely, choose from a variety of tractor attachments.

In addition to spraying, tractors are used in orchards to mow.  According to the 2011 New England Fruit Tree Management Guide, “mowing is the most important orchard floor management tool.” The orchard floor affects the health of the trees in many ways.  If the floor is wild and filled with hardy weeds, they could compete with young trees or provide rodents with the perfect habitat.  If this is the case, you will need to mow more often, so one way to reduce compaction is to plant a slow-growing grass such as a fescue.  That way, says the Guide, you will mow much less often. Also, if using conventional methods to maintain the orchard floor, one should try to be reasonable.  For example, if a conventional orchardist maintains a narrow strip (maintained with herbicide) underneath the trees, natural predators of mites are more likely to move from the grass to the trees.  If the strip is too wide, however, there will be more problems and fewer benefits. Bare soil (the “clean cultivation” method) can increase risk of soil erosion.  If this method is used, it is important to have a fall cover crop.  If not, the roots will be susceptible to frost damage. “In addition to these potential risks, calcium availability to trees may be reduced and soil compaction problems may develop” with repeated cultivation (2011 New England Tree Fruit Management Guide).  In my opinion, the best bet is to plant a slow-growing grass when starting a new orchard, and then maintain that with a mower.  

There are two types of mowers useful for orchards:  the rotary mower and the flail mower. The rotary mower requires less horsepower and can reach further under the trees.  The flail mower requires more horsepower, but is able to chop up fallen wood and prunings and return them to the soil, which is good orchard practice, as long as they are not diseased (Orchard Equipment).

How does compaction affect the trees? Compaction alters how porous the soil is.  The sizes of the pores in soil control ease of absorption of air and water, soil fertility, and the root growth of the plants (Vogeler, Iris; Cichota, Rogerio; Sivakumaran, Siva; Deurer, Markus; McIvor, Ian ).  Compaction has been said to increase risk of root diseases and restricts feeder roots and also affects fruit yield negatively (Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems).  

What can be done to lessen the effects of compaction? In orchards, you could till the soil and plant a cover crop.  One such tiller is “The Aerway® AWV3 models … designed to eliminate soil compaction, reduce runoff and improve moisture retention without destroying the soil structure in orchards and vineyards (Taskpower).  Another method is deep plowing.  In an experiment with a “wing-delve plow to a depth of 80 cm at a distance of 1 m from the tree stems on one side of tree rows, followed with deep plowing on the other side 16 months later,” “deep-plowed soil showed strong root regrowth at 20-80 cm soil depth compared to fewer roots in the unplowed soil” 18 months later and the feeder roots, where pruned, showed “prolific regrowth.” Furthermore, fruit size and yield were said to improve significantly (Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems).   Another technique is to compost and mulch under apple trees.  It becomes a personal choice of what to do because these methods involve the use of heavy machinery, and some present the risk of erosion.  It all comes down to what you think will be most effective.

Lorraine P. Berkett, Renae E. Moran , M. Elena Garcia, Heather M. Darby, Robert L. Parsons, Terence L. Bradshaw, Sarah L. Kingsley-Richards, and Morgan C. Griffith, . “Orchard Equipment.” Practical Guide for Organic Apple Production. OrganicA, n.d. Web. 10 Aug 2012. <http://www.uvm.edu/~organica/PracticalGuide/OrchardEquipment.html&gt;.

Taskpower, . “Aerators: Orchards and Vineyards.” Taskpower: New Zealand Limited. Zeald, 2010. Web. 10 Aug 2012. <http://www.taskpower.co.nz/AERATORS/Orchards and Vineyards.html>.

Vogeler, Iris; Cichota, Rogerio; Sivakumaran, Siva; Deurer, Markus; McIvor, Ian, . “Soil assessment of apple orchards under conventional and organic management.” Australian Journal of Soil Research. (Dec. 1, 2006): n. page. Web. 10 Aug. 2012. <http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Soil assessment of apple orchards under conventional and organic…-a0157032846>.

Norman Uphoff, Andrew S. Ball, Erick Fernandes, Hans Herren, Olivier Husson, Mark Laing, Cheryl Palm, Jules Pretty, Pedro Sanchez, Nteranya Sanginga, Janice Thies, First. Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. March 3, 2006. eBook. <http://books.google.com/books?id=XO3pio5Opy8C&pg=PA552&lpg=PA552&dq=soil+compaction+in+orchard&source=bl&ots=Rklgxe1rXT&sig=UT8jH7XwuinIrvXM7T929QISAPU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WHQkULuGOI6f6QGIqoGQBQ&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=soil%20compaction%20in%20orchard&f=false&gt;

Cooley, Daniel R., Lorraine M. Los, George Hamilton, et al. Cornell, UCONN, UMASS, UNH, UVM, University of Maine Extensions. “Groundcover Management.” 2011 New England Tree Fruit Management Guide. 2011. Print.

Massachusetts Water Protection Regulations and Guidelines for Sheep Farmers

Theresa Werme
6/1/12
Massachusetts Water Protection Regulations and Guidelines for Sheep Farmers

Massachusetts water quality is controlled via laws and regulations, BMPs (Best Management Practices), and benefits for farmers who follow conservation practices. The state government works with federal and local (such as the Conservation Commission, Open Space Committee, Zoning Board of Appeals, Planning Board, and Water & Sewer of Douglas, MA, where members of the community are currently debating articles about groundwater and watershed) government. For example, the DEP, a state program, acts for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), a branch of the EPA (these are federal programs). This can get complicated, but luckily the Massachusetts state government is willing to work with its constituents as well as with federal organizations and laws.

Federal law often affects Massachusetts water policies. The Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management (DEP), with the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA [state govt.]), submitted the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative on April 1, 1998. The catalyst for this proposal, Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA [of the EPA]), mandates that states “develop a list of impaired waters and estimates of the maximum amount of pollution allowed where existing controls are not stringent enough to attain compliance with State Water Quality Standards.” Also required by the CWA was the use of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for the waters in question. To create a TMDL, the allowed amount of pollutant for a certain body of water is compared with the distribution of that load to “point and non-point sources.” Then, the EPA required that all states submit a plan for completing all of their TMDLs for the next 8-13 years. The DEP submitted a two-phase approach to collaborate with the EPA to create plans for areas with poor operations, and to continue to “work closely” with the EPA through 2012 (Footnote: 1)

Following state-issued BMPs prevents trouble with the state. Sheep produce 40 lb manure per day, at (lb/ton) 12 N, 5 P2O5, and 9 K2O (UMASS 8-20). Knowing this, farmers should base application of manure on timing (avoid spreading from winter to early spring), location (avoid spreading on slopes, flooding plains, or within 200 feet of a water source), and incorporation (within 72 hours of application) (“Manure” pg. 1). (Footnote: 2)

Dispose of animal carcasses by composting under proper Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources guidelines to avoid needing a permit, states the University of Massachusetts Agricultural Extension (UMASS, 8-14). Farmers are advised to use manure rather than commercial fertilizer, develop a “nutritional management plan” (UMASS 8-17) and sample soil and manure. Forage should include at least 30% legume; if not, supplementary N will be needed to maintain the pasture. Needed for good forage for sheep are water, fencing, nutrients, and crop. They do not require as much shelter as other livestock would. (Footnote: 3)

Beneficial programs also exist. The Massachusetts Agricultural Environmental Enhancement Program (AEEP) seeks to support farmers utilizing “conservation practices that prevent direct impacts on water quality [and] ensure efficient use of water.” Volunteers are reimbursed up to $25,000 for installation and materials. Eligible practices include “manure waste storage, irrigation efficiency, water control structures, pesticide storage facilities, and fencing” to exclude livestock from water sources. Land must be designated as agricultural or horticultural. Areas with troublesome environmental issues are more likely to be chosen; those with an NRCS [federal] Conservation Plan can also qualify for financial aid from the USDA (http://www.mass.gov/agr/programs/aeep/).

 

Footnotes:

  1.  “Department of Environmental Protection – Division of Watershed Management (1998). DEP’s Proposed Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) Strategy to Improve the Water Quality of Massachusetts Rivers and Lakes.” Retrieved from
  2. Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources – “Manure Management: Protecting Water Resources from Nutrient Pollution.”
  3. UMass Extension Crops, Dairy, Livestock, Equine – http://www.umass.edu/cdl – “Livestock and Poultry BMPs.” Retrieved from